Method and application for a reactive defense against illegal distribution of multimedia content in file sharing networks

ABSTRACT

A system for external monitoring of networked digital file sharing to track predetermined data content, the system comprising: at least one surveillance element for deployment over said network, said surveillance elements comprising: surveillance functionality for searching said digital file sharing and identification functionality associated with said search functionality for identification of said predetermined data content, therewith to determine whether a given file sharing system is distributing said predetermined data content.

RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is a divisional of U.S. patent application Ser. No.12/615,332 filed on Nov. 10, 2009, which is a divisional of U.S. patentapplication Ser. No. 09/897,013 filed on Jul. 3, 2001, now U.S. Pat. No.7,627,897, which claims the benefit of priority under 35 USC §119(e) ofU.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 60/259,228 filed on Jan. 3,2001. The contents of the above applications are all incorporated byreference as if fully set forth herein in their entirety.

FIELD OF THE INVENTION

The present invention relates generally to the field of digitalcopyright protection. More specifically, the present invention dealswith identification of and active/reactive protection measures againstcopyright infringement of digital media in digital file sharing networksand publicly accessible distribution systems.

FIELD AND BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

File sharing systems and other publicly accessible distribution systemsover the Internet are often used for distribution of copyright protectedcontent, such distribution often comprises infringement of copyrightprotection laws. Such illegal or unauthorized distribution causefinancial damages to the lawful content owners. It is therefore of greatinterest to find a method that may stop or at least reduce such actswithout, at the same time, interfering with the lawful use of suchsystems.

Methods for copyright enforcement over digitally distributed media infile distribution and sharing systems are known. Some of the knownmethods are only affective for providing protection against centralizedfile sharing systems, where locating desired content is aided by acentral server or servers providing the service. (e.g., the “Napster”file sharing service). In such a case, software on such central serversmay monitor information exchange, and thereby prohibit illegal orunauthorized use. Such methods require the cooperation of the serviceoperator or administrator. However, protection of copyrighted contentdelivered through decentralized distribution systems (some times knownas “peer to peer” networks—e.g., “Gnutella”, “FreeNet”, “Usenet” etc'),as well as protection of copyrighted content in centralized file sharingservices without the cooperation of the service operator oradministrator, is much harder, and these problems are not addressed bycurrent legal or technological methods. It is foreseeable that as theavailability of disk space and bandwidth for data communicationincreases, illegal or unauthorized distribution of video and audiocontent may become prevalent unless effective counter-measures areavailable.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

According to a first aspect of the present invention there is provided asystem for external monitoring of networked digital file sharing totrack predetermined data content, the system comprising:

at least one surveillance element for distribution over the network, thesurveillance elements comprising:

-   -   search functionality for nodewise searching of the networked        digital file sharing and    -   identification functionality associated with the search        functionality for identification of the predetermined data        content, therewith to determine whether a given file sharing        system is distributing the predetermined data content.

Preferably, the search functionality is operable to carry out searchingat a low level of a network protocol.

Alternatively or additionally, the search functionality is operable tocarry out searching at a high level of a network protocol.

Alternatively or additionally, the search functionality is operable tocarry out the searching at an application level.

Preferably, the surveillance element is a first surveillance element inwhich the search functionality comprises functionality for operatingsearch features of the networked digital file sharing.

Preferably, the identification functionality comprises use of asignature of the predetermined content.

Preferably, the signature comprises a title of the predeterminedcontent.

Preferably, the signature comprises a derivative of a title of thepredetermined content.

Preferably, the signature comprises a statistical processing resultcarried out on the content.

Preferably, the signature comprises a signal processing result carriedout on the content.

Preferably, the signature comprises a description of the content.

Preferably, the signature is a derivative of the description of thecontent.

Preferably, the surveillance element is a second surveillance elementand comprises interception functionality for intercepting data transporton the network, and wherein the identification functionality isassociated with the interception functionality for finding an indicationof the data content within the intercepted data transport.

Preferably, the identification functionality comprises a signature ofthe predetermined content for comparison with data of the interceptedmessage to determine whether the message contains the evidence of thedata content.

Preferably, the content comprises alphanumeric data and the signature isa derivation of the alphanumeric data.

Preferably, the content comprises binary data and the signaturecomprises a derivation of the binary data.

Preferably, the derivation is a hash function of the binary data.

Preferably, the derivation is a function of metadata of the content.

Preferably, the signature comprises a title of the data content.

Preferably, the signature comprises a derivative of the title of thedata content.

Preferably, the signature comprises a statistical processing resultcarried out on the content.

Preferably, the signature comprises a signal processing result carriedout on the content.

Preferably, the signature comprises a description of the content.

Preferably, the signature comprises a derivative of the description ofthe content.

Preferably, the surveillance element further comprises input/outputfunctionality for receiving commands from the system and sending resultsof the search.

Preferably, the system further comprises a co-ordination element forinteracting with the distributed input/output functionality to controldeployment of the surveillance elements over the network and to monitorresults from a plurality of the surveillance elements.

Preferably, the co-ordination element is further operable to interactwith reaction elements by providing the reaction elements with detailsof locations of the predetermined content obtained from the surveillanceelements, thereby to prompt the reaction elements to react against thelocations.

Preferably, the file sharing comprises a document exchange system andthe surveillance element further comprises functionality forrepresenting itself as a host server for the system, thereby to obtaindata of documents on the system for the search functionality.

In a particularly preferred embodiment there is additionally provided:

at least two first surveillance elements, each first surveillanceelement comprising functionality for operating search features of thenetworked digital file sharing.

at least two second surveillance elements, each the second surveillanceelement comprising interception functionality for intercepting messagingon the network, and wherein the identification functionality isassociated with the interception functionality for identifying evidencesof the data content within the intercepted messages, and

at least one control element for deploying the surveillance elementsaround the network and obtaining search results from the surveillanceelements.

Preferably, the surveillance element is a first surveillance element andthe search functionality comprises functionality for operating searchfeatures of the networked digital file sharing.

Preferably, the identification input functionality is operable toreceive input from a comparator associated with a signature holder forholding a signature of the predetermined content, the comparator beingoperable to compare the content against the signature thereby toindicate to the input functionality the presence of the content.

Preferably, the signature comprises a title of the predeterminedcontent.

Preferably, the signature is a derivative of a title of thepredetermined content.

Preferably, the signature comprises a statistical processing resultcarried out on the content.

Preferably, the signature comprises a signal processing result carriedout on the content.

Preferably, the signature comprises a description of the content.

Preferably, the signature comprises a derivative of a description of thecontent.

Preferably, the surveillance element is a second surveillance elementand comprises interception functionality for intercepting messaging onthe network, and wherein the identification functionality is associatedwith the interception functionality for identifying evidences of thedata content within the intercepted messages.

Preferably, the search functionality further comprises input/outputfunctionality for receiving commands from the system and sending resultsof the search.

Preferably, the system further comprises a co-ordination element forinteracting with the distributed input/output functionality to controldeployment of the surveillance elements over the network and to monitorresults from a plurality of the surveillance elements, the co-ordinationelement further being operable to interact with the attack elements byproviding the attack elements with details of locations of thepredetermined content obtained from the surveillance elements, therebyto prompt the attack elements to attack the locations.

Preferably, the file sharing comprises a document exchange system andthe surveillance element further comprises functionality forrepresenting itself as a host server for the system, thereby to obtaindata of the file sharing for the search functionality.

Preferably, the identification functionality is operable to identifyitems in the document exchange system comprising the predeterminedcontent.

Preferably, the attack element comprises functionality to send to thesystem a delete command to delete the item throughout the system.

Preferably, the attack element comprises repetitive output functionalityfor repeatedly sending response requests to the file sharing system.

Preferably, the response request comprises a download request.

The system is preferably operable to co-ordinate response requestsbetween a plurality of attack elements distributed over the network.

The system is preferably operable to co-ordinate download requestsbetween a plurality of the attack elements distributed over the network.

Preferably, the surveillance agent is a third surveillance element,comprising network protocol scan functionality operable to intercept andanalyze network communication items of a predetermined network traffic,thereby to find protected content in transport.

The system preferably comprises at least one attack element, wherein theattack functionality is operable to utilize features of the file sharingin the attack.

A preferred embodiment comprises at least one attack element wherein theattack functionality comprises transport interference functionality forinterfering with messaging over the network.

Preferably, the transport interference functionality comprises exchangefunctionality for exchanging the predetermined message content in themessaging with other message content.

Preferred embodiment additionally or alternatively comprise:

at least two first surveillance elements, each first search elementcomprising functionality for operating search features of the networkeddigital file sharing,

at least two second surveillance elements, each the second surveillanceelement comprising interception functionality for intercepting messagingon the network, and wherein the identification functionality isassociated with the interception functionality for identifying evidencesof the data content within the intercepted messages,

at least two of the attack elements, and

at least one control element for distributing the surveillance andattack elements around the network, obtaining surveillance results fromthe surveillance elements, and coordinating activity of the attackelements to carry out a coordinated multiple point attack on the filesharing system.

According to a second aspect of the present invention there is provideda system for external monitoring and control of networked digital filesharing to track predetermined data content and limit distributionthereof, the system comprising:

at least one surveillance element for distribution over the network, thesurveillance element comprising:

-   -   surveillance functionality for searching the digital file        sharing and    -   identification input functionality associated with the search        functionality for receiving an indication of the presence of the        predetermined content, and    -   at least one attack element, comprising:        -   input functionality for receiving identification data of a            file sharing system found to be distributing the            predetermined content, and        -   attack functionality for applying an attack to the file            sharing system to reduce the file sharing system's ability            to distribute the predetermined data content.

According to a third aspect of the present invention there is provided anetwork external content distribution control system comprising:

network content identification functionality for identifyingpredetermined content distributed over a digital file sharing network,the network comprising a plurality of nodes, and

network attack functionality for applying an attack over the digitalfile sharing network, the attack being directable to reduce the abilityof the network to distribute the identified content.

Preferably, at least one of the nodes is identified to have thepredetermined content, and at least one of the nodes being identified asa distribution node of the network, the attack being directable at thedistribution node.

According to a fourth aspect of the present invention there is provideda network external content distribution control system comprising atleast one surveillance unit for exploring a network to determine atleast one of a presence and a distribution pattern of predeterminedcontent and for reporting the determination for remote analysis.

According to a fifth aspect of the present invention there is provided anetwork scanning element for use in a network external contentdistribution control system, the scanning element being operable to scanat least a portion of a network suspected of distributing predeterminedcontent by connecting to available ports in the network portion, via theport connections to determine the presence of network nodesparticipating in the distribution.

According to a sixth aspect of the present invention there is provided amethod of externally scanning a distributed network comprising aplurality of nodes, to search for predetermined content available fordistribution from the nodes, the method comprising:

distributing at least one surveillance element to the network, thesurveillance element comprising:

search functionality for nodewise searching of the networked digitalfile sharing and

identification functionality associated with the search functionalityfor identification of the predetermined data content, therewith todetermine whether a given file sharing system is distributing thepredetermined data content.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

The present invention will be understood and appreciated more fully fromthe following detailed description taken in conjunction with theappended drawings in which:

FIG. 1 is a simplified block diagram of a first preferred embodiment ofthe present invention showing a surveillance subsystem and acountermeasures subsystem;

FIG. 2 is a simplified block diagram of the embodiment of FIG. 1 ingreater detail, showing elements of the subsystems of FIG. 1;

FIG. 3 is an illustration of the topology of decentralized peer-to-peerfile sharing system such as “Gnutella”, together with the position ofthe system elements;

FIG. 4 is an illustration of an initiated search by “surveillanceelement”;

FIG. 5 is an illustration of a simple denial of service (DoS) attack,based on sending multiple “syn” messages against a distributor ofillegal or unauthorized content;

FIG. 6 is an illustration of another simple denial of service (DoS)attack, based on multiple requests, in short time intervals, to makeconnections;

FIG. 7 is an example of another possible action against the illegal orunauthorized distributor, which is based on simultaneous download of theillegal or unauthorized content using several connections;

FIG. 8 is an illustration of a method that allows an attack even in casein which the distributor is protected by a “firewall” software. In thiscase, the offensive element initiate a “push” request using methods thatare supplied by the file sharing system, thereby causing the distributorto establish a file “push” initiative (e.g., HTTP connection) with theoffensive element;

FIG. 9 is an illustration of the usage of an intrusive surveillanceelement, which scans communication protocols such as Internet Protocolin order to find illegal or unauthorized content in transport;

FIG. 10 is an illustration of a method to reduce the desirability ofillegal or unauthorized usage of file sharing systems by replaying torequests for an illegal or unauthorized content by sending versions ofthe content that may not satisfy the user;

FIG. 11 is an illustration of two search methods for illegal orunauthorized content in a newsgroup; and

FIG. 12 is an illustration of two methods for canceling newsgroupmessages that contain illegal or unauthorized content.

DESCRIPTION OF SPECIFIC EMBODIMENTS OF THE INVENTION

Embodiments of the present invention comprise a method and system forinformation gathering about the distribution of illegal or unauthorizedcontent in file sharing and distribution systems, and possibly foractive reduction of the availability of file sharing and distributionsystems for the unauthorized distribution of copyrighted content onpublicly accessible networks. The system preferably comprises one ormore types of surveillance elements, which accumulate different kinds ofinformation regarding the illegal or unauthorized distribution ofcopyrighted content over file sharing and distribution systems, as wellas other information that may be relevant for attempts to stop or reducesuch distribution. The system may also use one or more types ofoffensive elements, which may attempt to stop or reduce the illegal orunauthorized distribution once the possible or actual existence of suchan act is detected. The above elements may be physically separated,thereby increasing the robustness of the system against counter-countermeasures. The identification of the illegal or unauthorized content isexecuted inside a surveillance element, and may be based on alphanumericdata, such as the possible variants of its title and/or a derivative ofits title and/or description, and/or on “signatures” of binary files(e.g., a “hash function” of the binary file or parts thereof) and/or onthe properties of the content as video and/or as audio signal and/or asa textual content (e.g., methods that are based on the identification ofa signature indicating the content), or on meta data included with thecontent (such as ID3 tags). Once illegal or unauthorized distribution ofcontent via a certain file sharing system and/or newsgroup is detected,by one or more of the surveillance elements, the system may useoffensive elements in order to attempt to interfere with the illegal orunauthorized activities. The offensive elements may use specificfeatures and known vulnerabilities of the file sharing and distributionsystems and/or vulnerabilities in the infrastructures such systemsdepend upon. In particular, the present disclosure describes severalmethods that can be used against illegal file distribution indecentralized, peer-to-peer file sharing system, such as “Gnutella”, andagainst the document distribution network commonly referred to as“Internet newsgroups”.

The present embodiments provide a method and system that can be used inorder to monitor and/or reduce or eliminate the use of file-sharingnetworks and/or newsgroups for illegal content distribution in computernetworks such as the Internet. The embodiments may be used to supplementa secure content distribution system, e.g. a video or audio-on demandsystem operating over the Internet or other network.

Reference is now made to FIG. 1, which is a simplified block diagramshowing a system according to a first preferred embodiment of thepresent invention. A network content distribution surveillance andreaction system 10 comprises two subsystems 12 and 14, the first ofwhich 12 is a surveillance subsystem for carrying out surveillance ofthe file-sharing network and document distribution system. Thesurveillance subsystem preferably makes use of surveillance elements, asreferred to above, to gather data about the various content items thatare available. The second subsystem 14 is a countermeasure subsystemcomprising the offensive or attack elements referred to above, which areable to take various active steps in order to reduce or eliminateillegal content distribution.

Reference is now made to FIG. 2, which is a simplified block diagramshowing the two subsystems of FIG. 1 in greater detail. In FIG. 2, thesystem is shown to comprise a series of elements for use together. Onesuch element, referred to hereinbelow as a first surveillance element16, is preferably a network application that appears as a regular agentor client of the file-sharing network. The surveillance elementspreferably perform a search for to-be-protected content, specificallyusing tools that the file-sharing system supplies for such a search. Thesurveillance elements may use a polymorphic search, possibly in severallanguages and/or several cinematic cuts and/or several audio mixingsessions in order to cover the various forms in which the content namesor descriptors may appear. The search for specific content may beobscured using a wider search for innocent content. The search forspecific content is referred to hereinbelow as an initiated search. Suchan approach takes advantage of one essential property of the filesharing and/or distribution system, that in order to be convenient forusers, content has to be easy to find. If the initiated search forcesthe distribution systems to use less straightforward content names itwill have made the illegal material less available to users and willhave to some extent achieved its purpose.

If the file-sharing and/or distribution system does not allow searches,and in an attempt to increase the amount of content that it is possibleto detect, an attempt to guess content names is preferably made, usingmethods such as the so-called dictionary attack, based on the name ofthe protected content and/or an attempt to crawl the file-sharingcontent space using various methods provided by the file sharingnetwork, and/or crawling or searching other locations or networks whichmay refer to content in the aforementioned file-sharing system. Themethod will be described in greater detail below.

Additional elements 18, referred to as second surveillance elementspreferably perform a search that is based on an analysis of data beingtransported, for example query data or data being downloaded, betweenother elements in the network. Such a transport analysis type of searchis referred to hereinbelow as a transport search. The secondsurveillance elements preferably use high-performance computers, withwide bandwidth and disc space and an optimized connection scheme, inorder to process large amounts of traffic and thereby find a largeproportion of traffic of illegal content and data relating thereto. Thesurveillance elements preferably use a polymorphic indexed search basedon the content name and\or descriptor (possibly in several languages)and\or a search for a signature of the content, i.e., idiosyncraticproperties of the audio and\or video signal, that either exist in theoriginal signal or are added to the original signal as watermarks.Methods for obtaining signatures relating to an earlier search andperforming searches are described, e.g., in U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,125,229,5,870,754 and 5,819,286. Methods for watermark embedding and usage aredescribed, e.g., in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,960,081, 5,809,139 and 6,131,161.The contents of each of the above documents are hereby incorporated byreference.

A further type of surveillance element is the intrusive surveillanceelement 20. Intrusive surveillance elements preferably scancommunication protocols such as Internet Protocol in order to findillegal content in transport. If such content is found, the elements canreport about the illegal transport to the appropriate authorities, andmay interfere with the content transport method and interrupt or cancelthe transfer.

The surveillance elements and/or the intrusive surveillance elements maybe present or rely on scanning not only of lower levels of the networkprotocols (such as network data-link and transport) but also of higherlevels (up to and including application levels, especially whenconsidering the case of a virtual network whose lower levels are basedon the higher level of the basic underlying network. The latter isgenerally the case in many file sharing networks.

Also there are provided two kinds of offensive elements, internaloffensive or attack elements 22 and external offensive elements 24.Again, the offensive elements are preferably embodied as autonomousagents, able to locate themselves at will over the network. The internalagents 22 are based on file sharing system protocols (often involvingclient programs) and appear to be nodes of the network. The internaloffensive agents 22 preferably use the features of the file sharingsystem in order to perform various attacks on distributors of illegalcontent, as will be described in more detail below.

The external offensive elements 24 need not use the file sharing systemprotocols. External offensive elements 24 may preferably use varioustypes of attacks that may not be possible while using the standardfile-sharing network programs.

There are preferably also provided hybrid elements 26 which incorporatevarious combinations of properties of the above elements.

A further element for incorporation in the system is a system manager orcoordinator element 28. As mentioned above, the elements referred to maybe distributed over a network. A unit is thus preferably provided toaccumulate the network intelligence data from the surveillance entities,analyze the data, and coordinate required attacks. The coordinator maylikewise be provided as an autonomous agent, providing the advantagethat the system as a whole is able to center itself anywhere on thenetwork, making it harder for countermeasures to be effective.

Reference is now made to FIG. 3, which is a simplified block diagramshowing a decentralized peer-to-peer file sharing system such as“Gnutella”, and illustrating preferred positions of the system entities.The first two surveillance elements, (A), and (B) perform distributedinitiated searches for the content to be protected, while the next twosurveillance elements (C) and (D) perform transport searches. In oneembodiment of the system, results of the above searches are thenreturned to the coordinator (E) via a secure channel (dashed arrowspointed to (E)). Elements (F) and (G) are system offensive agents andelement (H) is an external offensive element that can perform attacksagainst (I) (black arrows). The attacks can be coordinated by thecoordinator (E) (dashed arrows starting from (E)). In another embodimentof the system, the system elements communicate using a “peer-to-peer”type of communication.

Reference is now made to FIG. 4, which is a block diagram of thedecentralized peer to peer file sharing system of FIG. 3, illustratingelement interaction in an initiated search by the first surveillanceelement (A). A search query propagates via the system elements to reacha possible distributor of illegal content (I), who replies that he hasthe content. The search answers prorogate back to (A). (A) then connectsto (I) and preferably starts to download the content. (A) may furthercheck that the downloaded content is indeed the required content bycomparing a signature of the required content with the signature of thedownloaded content.

The information gathered by the surveillance elements (e.g., the detailsof the replays to its queries) can be used in order to create reportsand (possibly) also to inform the interested parties (e.g., via e-mailor web-based interface)

Methods for performing denial of service (DoS) attacks are known, andare regularly performed, (often illegally), against Internet servers. Inthe context of the present embodiments, DoS attacks are preferablyperformed against servers of file sharing systems that are involved inillegal digital content piracy, providing that the required legalauthorization exists.

Reference is now made to FIG. 5, which is a simplified timing diagramdescribing a simple attack that the offensive elements may performagainst an illegal content distributor. The attack is a standard “denialof service” (DoS) attack, and is based on multiple “syn” messages withpreferably spoofed (forged) IP addresses. As known to the skilledperson, a spoofed IP address may be a legal (routable) IP address of anon-existent or otherwise irrelevant network entity. In some filesharing networks, e.g., “Gnutella”, the attacker need not be part of thenetwork. The attack is preferably continued or even increased until(I)'s resources are exhausted.

Reference is now made to FIG. 6, which is a further timing diagramillustrating another simple DoS attack. The attack is based on multiplerequests, in short time intervals, to make connections (e.g., TCPconnections) with the distributor (I). The attack again preferablycontinues until the resources of (I) (e.g., connectivity, CPU, RAM,storage etc.) are exhausted.

Reference is now made to FIG. 7, which is a network element diagramshowing an example of another possible attack against the illegaldistributor (I). The attack is based on simultaneous download of theillegal content using several connections (either via a single elementor via several coordinated elements). Preferably, the number ofsimultaneous downloads is such as to saturate the system or, at least,reduce the available resources of (I).

Reference is now made to FIG. 8, which is a schematic diagramillustrating elements involved in an attack over a firewall. Often thedistributor is protected by firewall software, which does not allow theoffensive elements to initiate a file “get” (e.g., an HTTP connectionable to initiate downloading of the data) with the distributor. In thecase of a firewall, the offensive element preferably initiates a “push”request using methods that are supplied by the file sharing system(usually sending the request over a control connection initiated by theserver), thereby causing the distributor to initiate the required filetransfer with the offensive element (either by opening connection to theoffensive element or by transferring the file over existing connectionsthrough the firewall). The attack thus takes advantage of the fact thatthe firewall protection has to leave openings to allow regularfunctioning of the distribution system.

In another form of attack, at least two separate (and possibly verydifferent) offensive elements may be involved—the one sending therequest, and the one receiving the file, either may have other functionsin the system (especially the first which may mainly be a surveillanceelement), where a controlling element may be involved in coordinatingthe attack.

Reference is now made to FIG. 9, which is a schematic diagram showinghow the intrusive surveillance element may be used to carry outtransport searches. The illegal distributor generally uses acommunication protocol such as the Internet Protocol (IP) in order tosend data to a client unit. Preferably, the intrusive surveillanceelement intercepts and scans data coming from a suspected illegaldistributor, using the relevant communication protocols, in order tofind illegal transport content. Detection may be based on alphanumericdescriptions of the content it is sought to protect and/or on theaudio/video/text signal properties thereof.

Reference is now made to FIG. 10, which is a simplified schematicdiagram showing a method for reducing the desirability to end users ofillegal file sharing systems. The method comprises intercepting requestsfor illegal content and replying to them by sending a version of thecontent that does not satisfy the user. The versions may be for exampledefective, of low visual or audio quality, contain large amounts ofunwanted material, be totally irrelevant etc. The request is interceptedbefore it reaches the illegal content provider and thus he does not evenknow that the request was made. On the other hand the user receivescontent in reply to his request, which preferably partly corresponds towhat he requested, leading him to believe that he downloaded theinformation from the site to which he addressed his request but that thesite provides sub-standard material. The user is thus discouraged fromusing the source again.

Other possible attacks that may be considered for use in the presentembodiments may be based on exploitation of flaws in the clients. Forexample clients expect data to conform to certain protocol standards andit is possible to intercept requests and send data that does not conformto the relevant protocols. Thus malformed messages that cannot beprocessed by the client may be considered. Possibilities for malformedmessages included messages comprising non null terminated strings, spoofpush sources, wrong field size descriptors, malformed get requests (i.e.non numeric file index). Such attacks have the potential to disable theclient or seriously disrupt its operation if not anticipated by theprogrammer.

In some file sharing systems (e.g., “Gnutella”), requests arecharacterized by identification numbers (“request ID”). In general,nodes in the network will not propagate a request if they have alreadypropagated a request with the same ID. Another possible attack that maybe considered for use in the present embodiments may therefore be basedon the following method: When an attack element receives a request forillegal content, it propagates a spoofed request with the same IDnumber, thereby, with some probability, causing some of nodes to neglectthe original request. Other similar methods of using spoofed orotherwise fake messages can be used to disrupt some aspects of thenetwork or of a certain node or nodes in it, depending on thespecification of the network.

A coordination element or elements may be present which would coordinatesuch attacks.

Another surveillance element which should be considered is a portscanning element—which may scan a given portion of the network, tryingto connect to all, or to a subset of the available ports in the networkportion, and establish a connection of the file sharing network, tryingto discern if there are content sharing nodes in it. This surveillanceelement may be autonomous or coordinated with other elements.

It is observed that the above described system may also accumulate andreport or otherwise use data about what is shared and transferred anddivulge information about the participating parties, their locations,interests etc. which may be used for decision making, legal marketing orother purposes.)

It is also noted that Artificial Intelligence methods may be used forvarious needs of such a system (such as methods for recognizing thecontent and related information—especially text analyzing methods,symbolic logic and some forms of fuzzy logic) and for correlating datagathered to produce more meaningful or valuable information.

Document Distribution Networks

Focusing now on document distribution networks, primary considerationwill be given to the Internet Newsgroup document distribution network,since it is widely used for document distribution in infringement ofcopyright and for illegal distribution of video and audio content. Themethods described herein are nevertheless applicable, in whole or inpart, to other document distribution networks.

Detection of Illegal Content in Newsgroups

Reference is now made to FIG. 11, which is a simplified schematicdiagram of a newsgroup server client arrangement. Newsgroups arenon-proprietary lists of messages placed by individual users and thus itis neither possible nor desirable to attack the newsgroup itself. Ratherthe target in the case of the newsgroup has to be the individual messagecontaining the illegal content.

Two methods for detection of illegal content in newsgroups are describedhereinbelow. In the first method a search client element (101) accordingto an embodiment of the present invention logs on to a news server inthe same way as a regular client, and builds a listing or carries outdownloading of the messages in the groups suspected of delivery of theprotected content.

After the messages have been received, they are preferably assembledtogether to reconstruct (wholly or partly) the original files sent. Thatis to say, in newsgroups, large files are usually sent by splitting theminto much smaller files and generally the material that it is desired toprotect tends to be large. The reconstructed file may then be examinedby other methods referred to in the present disclosure.

Another method of detecting newsgroup content comprises connecting tothe news server in the guise of another news server (102), andrequesting batch delivery of the news groups of interest. Once deliveryis complete, the server's spool contains all the messages that belong tothe groups requested, where they may undergo composition and analysis asin the first method.

Cancellation of Messages that Contain Illegal Content.

Reference is now made to FIG. 12. FIG. 12 is a simplified block diagramillustrating how an attack may be launched against illegal content on anewsgroup. Once protected content has been discovered, the system mayissue commands to the news server network to delete messages thatcontain the protected content. The commands are referred to in the artas “cancel message” and are preferably delivered from the client (101)to the local server (first method) or from the spoof server (102) toother servers (second method). The news servers network preferablypropagates the cancel message as an ordinary network message, eachserver in turn deleting the protected content when the cancel messagearrives.

In order to enhance the effectiveness of the newsgroup attack the cancelmessages may be delivered to multiple news servers at the same time,causing a reduction of the time for global propagation of the protectedcontent.

There is thus provided a method and apparatus for automatic externalcontent monitoring and control over computerized networks.

It is appreciated that one or more function of any of the methodsdescribed herein may be implemented in a different manner than thatshown while not departing from the spirit and scope of the invention.

While the methods and apparatus disclosed herein may or may not havebeen described with reference to specific hardware or software, themethods and apparatus have been described in a manner sufficient toenable persons having ordinary skill in the art to readily adaptcommercially available hardware and software as may be needed to reduceany of the embodiments of the present invention to practice withoutundue experimentation and using conventional techniques.

It is appreciated that certain features of the invention, which are, forclarity, described in the context of separate embodiments, may also beprovided in combination in a single embodiment. Conversely, variousfeatures of the invention which are, for brevity, described in thecontext of a single embodiment, may also be provided separately or inany suitable subcombination.

It will be appreciated by persons skilled in the art that the presentinvention is not limited to what has been particularly shown anddescribed hereinabove. Rather the scope of the present invention isdefined by the appended claims and includes both combinations andsubcombinations of the various features described hereinabove as well asvariations and modifications thereof which would occur to personsskilled in the art upon reading the foregoing description.

What is claimed is:
 1. A method for controlling distribution ofcopyrighted content on a digital file-sharing network comprising aplurality of nodes, the method comprising: connecting, by a computingdevice, to available port connections on the plurality of nodes; firstsearching, by the computing device, for copyrighted content whosedistribution for consumption it is desired to control on the pluralityof nodes, wherein said searching utilizes search features provided bythe digital file-sharing network; second searching, by the computingdevice, for the copyrighted content based on an analysis of data beingtransported between the plurality of nodes, wherein the analysiscomprises a scanning of a communication protocol used in the data beingtransported, wherein the second searching comprises a polymorphic searchof content names or descriptors to cover a plurality of forms in whichsaid content names or descriptors may appear, and wherein the secondsearching comprises further searching based on idiosyncratic propertiesthat exist in an original audio or video signal of the copyrightedcontent; logging on, by the computing device, to a server as a regularclient; downloading, by the computing device, messages on the server;reconstructing, by the computing device, an original file fromassembling the messages downloaded from the server and searching theoriginal file for the copyrighted content; and performing, by thecomputing device, a denial of service (DoS) attack against one or moreof the plurality of nodes that are involved in content piracy, whereinthe denial of service attack comprises one or more of: multiple “syn”messages, multiple connections, simultaneous downloads of thecopyrighted content, intercepting requests for the copyrighted contentand replying with a version of the copyrighted content that is of lowvisual or audio quality, contains large amounts of unwanted material, oris irrelevant, and sending malformed requests or data that does notcomply with protocols relevant to the digital file-sharing network.
 2. Acomputer system for controlling distribution of copyrighted content on adigital file-sharing network comprising a plurality of nodes, thecomputer system comprising one or more computing devices configured toperform acts comprising: connecting, by a computing device, to availableport connections on the plurality of nodes; first searching, by thecomputing device, for copyrighted content whose distribution forconsumption it is desired to control on the plurality of nodes, whereinsaid searching utilizes search features provided by the digitalfile-sharing network; second searching, by the computing device, for thecopyrighted content based on an analysis of data being transportedbetween the plurality of nodes, wherein the analysis comprises ascanning of a communication protocol used in the data being transported,wherein the second searching comprises a polymorphic search of contentnames or descriptors to cover a plurality of forms in which said contentnames or descriptors may appear, and wherein the second searchingcomprises further searching based on idiosyncratic properties that existin an original audio or video signal of the copyrighted content; loggingon, by the computing device, to a server as a regular client;downloading, by the computing device, messages on the server;reconstructing, by the computing device, an original file fromassembling the messages downloaded from the server and searching theoriginal file for the copyrighted content; and performing, by thecomputing device, a denial of service (DoS) attack against one or moreof the plurality of nodes that are involved in content piracy, whereinthe denial of service attack comprises one or more of: multiple “syn”messages, multiple connections, simultaneous downloads of thecopyrighted content, intercepting requests for the copyrighted contentand replying with a version of the copyrighted content that is of lowvisual or audio quality, contains large amounts of unwanted material, oris irrelevant, and sending malformed requests or data that does notcomply with protocols relevant to the digital file-sharing network.
 3. Anon-transitory computer-readable storage medium with instructions storedthereon that, when executed by one or more computing devices, cause theone or more computing devices to perform operations comprising:connecting to available port connections on the plurality of nodes;first searching for copyrighted content whose distribution forconsumption it is desired to control on the plurality of nodes, whereinsaid searching utilizes search features provided by the digitalfile-sharing network; second searching for the copyrighted content basedon an analysis of data being transported between the plurality of nodes,wherein the analysis comprises a scanning of a communication protocolused in the data being transported, wherein the second searchingcomprises a polymorphic search of content names or descriptors to covera plurality of forms in which said content names or descriptors mayappear, and wherein the second searching comprises further searchingbased on idiosyncratic properties that exist in an original audio orvideo signal of the copyrighted content; logging on to a server as aregular client; downloading messages on the server; reconstructing anoriginal file from assembling the messages downloaded from the serverand searching the original file for the copyrighted content; andperforming a denial of service (DoS) attack against one or more of theplurality of nodes that are involved in content piracy, wherein thedenial of service attack comprises one or more of: multiple “syn”messages, multiple connections, simultaneous downloads of thecopyrighted content, intercepting requests for the copyrighted contentand replying with a version of the copyrighted content that is of lowvisual or audio quality, contains large amounts of unwanted material, oris irrelevant, and sending malformed requests or data that does notcomply with protocols relevant to the digital file-sharing network.